Toward a Process Model of First Offers and Anchoring in Negotiations
- Wolfram Emanuel Lipp, wolfram.lipp@tum.de(compose email, opens in email app.), Technical University Munich, None
- Remigiusz Smolinski Remigiusz Smolinski ORCID profile. (opens in new tab) , HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management (opens in new tab)
- Peter Kesting Peter Kesting ORCID profile. (opens in new tab) , Strategy and Organizational Behavior, Aarhus University (opens in new tab)
Abstract
There is a wide consensus that first offers have a significant impact on negotiation outcomes by causing an anchoring effect. Many aspects of first offers have been analyzed, including factors that lead to making the first offer and characteristics that strengthen the impact of first offers. However, a holistic view of the process of first offers in negotiations remains missing, and significant research gaps must be filled to fully understand the mechanisms of first offers. Furthermore, while extant research contains anecdotal advice for negotiators, no holistic overview of research findings has been presented to date. This study conducted a structured review of 119 journal articles published since 1967, contributing to the field in four main ways: (a) proposing a definition of first offers, (b) integrating previous findings into a process model of first offers in negotiation, (c) summarizing the results to date in a structured literature review, and (d) identifying crucial research gaps that must be addressed. Future research should conduct systematic investigations of the influence of first offers on negotiation outcomes, employing a “negotiation lens” to emphasize the dyadic and interactive character of negotiations. Keywords: negotiation, conflict, first offer, anchoring, negotiation opening, structured reviewKeywords:
- negotiation
- conflict
- first offer
- anchoring
- negotiation opening
- structured review
How to Cite:
Lipp, W. E., Smolinski, R. & Kesting, P., (2022) “Toward a Process Model of First Offers and Anchoring in Negotiations”, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 16(1). https://doi.org/10.34891/2022.574 (external link, opens in new tab).
12752 Views
16945 Downloads
Published on
3 August 2022
Peer Reviewed