Special Issue Article
Authors: Elisabeth Naima Mikkelsen , Stewart Clegg
In this conceptual essay, we review the field of organizational conflict to unpack how it has been constructed genealogically and with what consequences by investigating three major shifts in theorization that have occurred over the past six decades. First, a move away from viewing conflict as dysfunctional to viewing it as constructive. Second, a shift from normative prescriptions to descriptions of what disputants do in conflict. Third, a shift from psychological functional analyses to studying conflict as an organizational phenomenon. We find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work: conflict as a distinct behavioral phenomenon, conflict as an instrumental means of achieving something else, and conflict as a social construction contingent on how reality is perceived. This conceptual essay adds to current thinking in organizational conflict research by emphasizing how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict can be seen to have framed knowledge production within the field when it is viewed historically.
Keywords: theorizing, philosophy of science, conflict management, organizational conflict
How to Cite: Mikkelsen, E. & Clegg, S. (2018) “Unpacking the Meaning of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research”, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research. 11(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.34891/zwxb-y758