Article
Author
The purpose of this article is to broaden the understanding of managerial conflict influence by suggesting a social complexity perspective on organizational conflict. From this perspective, influence is essentially a meaning‐based phenomenon that represents an interpretive view of organizational communication. Although some research exists that holds similar notions of managerial conflict influence, most research embodies a transmission view of communication and influence. Based on a qualitative analysis of 30 semi‐structured interviews, managerial conflict influence can be conceptualized according to two theoretical dimensions, directness and communicative influence, including five subdimensions: direct, indirect, distant, constraining, and enabling. A tentative typology of managerial conflict influence using the identified dimensions is proposed. Finally, theoretical and practical notions as well as limitations of the study are discussed.
managerial influence, organizational conflict, organizational communication, social complexity, conflict styles, third‐party intervention